Offshore Investing

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Local Funds
  • Offshore Funds
  • Legal
  • Providers
  • Links
  • Blog

The Cost of Using Bonds to House Your Offshore Funds

4 September, 2008

The argument as to whether to use an offshore bond to house your funds or not is a very relevant one for South African (and other) investors with overseas portfolios.

Some jurisdictions have tax regimes which have become complex and also rather draconian. This has led to life assurers based in those countries putting much time, effort and money into designing suitable, tax efficient offshore bond products for the use of their clients with offshore money.

Investment advisors who wish to grow their clients’ funds with the least amount of erosion from admin charges will tend to prefer the direct route of investment. That is, they will not recommend using bonds to house the various offshore funds but will rather go directly to the fund management houses to select the funds. This immediately cuts out a layer of cost which they may deem unnecessary.

This does create a bit more of an admin burden on the advisor, but he/she does need to do something to earn his/her trail fee now doesn’t he? Going the direct route also allows him/her more freedom in the selection of the funds which he deems suitable to his client’s risk profile as many offshore bonds have a finite list of “acceptable” funds which the advisor may use.

The “bond supporters” will say that there are many good reasons for using offshore bonds, such as delaying tax, putting sums in trust and you do not have to account annually for the income and capital gains accumulated. This means that you do not have annual accountant costs eating into the investment like you might with a directly held portfolio. Some of these are valid points.

A directly held portfolio of offshore funds needs to be structured in such a way that it does not require regular fiddling and switching to achive the investor’s objectives. If it is not structured in this way and the investor wishes to make some pretty major changes, he/she could be in for some pretty nasty capital gains taxes.

This decision depends therefore on your jurisdiction, your investment style as well as the type (tax status)of the funds you have invested in. It also depends on whether the investor fears tax more than he/she does losing out on extra performance.

Filed Under: Blog

CURRENCY CONVERTER

Blog Archives:

Popular Posts:

  • High Yielding Investment from Fedgroup
    Nov 19, 2014
  • Allan Gray’s Rand denominated overseas funds re-open, ...
    Apr 06, 2017
  • Tax Free Savings Plan
    May 14, 2015
  • Nero fiddles while Rome burns
    Feb 09, 2017
  • ALSI likely to produce negative returns for a while
    Nov 02, 2014
  • Trump bump or long term receovery?
    Mar 10, 2017
  • A New Year
    Jan 12, 2017
  • SA vs selected major ten year govt bond yields
    Apr 29, 2016
  • The Changing Oil Environment
    Dec 11, 2014
  • Retiring this year?
    Apr 20, 2015
  • Foreign Capital Allowance Increases and Curbs on the use of ...
    Mar 04, 2015
  • Are South African Bonds due for a hit?
    Aug 13, 2014
  • The Special Voluntary Disclosure Programme has opened
    Oct 05, 2016
  • Brexit Update and is the JSE the only place for me?
    Aug 08, 2016
  • Teach your kids about money
    Feb 02, 2015
  • Some tips on planning for your retirement
    Oct 28, 2019
  • Market Timing could cost you dearly
    Jul 24, 2009
  • Federal Reserve takes an investor friendly stance towards in...
    Dec 22, 2014

Sitemap:

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Graph illustrating selected ten year bond yields
  • Legal
  • Links
  • Local Funds
  • Offshore Funds
  • Providers

Connect with Us:

  • Email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Subscribe to our Blog:

Search this site:

© 2014. Groom Investment Consulting cc. All rights reserved. Designed & Customised by Terri Love Designs